HOME Media Kit Advertising Contact Us About Us

 

Web The Truth


Community Calendar

Dear Ryan

Classifieds

Online Issues

Send a Letter to the Editor


 

 
 

Public Servant Union, Toledo IAFF Local 92 Commits Unprecedented Betrayal

Guest Editorial

By Professor Emeritus Earl Murry, Ph.D.  Guest Contributor[1]
 

She had no idea what was coming, an African American mother of 3, she never imagined they would turn on her.  As a teen, her family had been saved by the efforts of Toledo firefighters. From that day forward she grew up dreaming of joining Toledo Fire, helping others and helping her community. She pushed herself, she was tested – physically and academically – and she passed. She qualified and was chosen as part of the incoming class at the Toledo Fire & Rescue Training Academy only to be betrayed by her own Union, Toledo Firefighters Local 92.

As a former union organizer; union member; university professor who taught collective bargaining; chief collective bargaining negotiator for private and public employers, and nearly 40 years of experience, I have never known any union, until now, to betray a dues-paying member in good standing by a filing an Amicus Brief with a court against that member and, in doing so, joined an employer, here the City of Toledo, against a member who sought to be reinstated from a wrongful termination. The Toledo IAFF Local 92 public filing is available to you by googling the Lucas County website, https://www.co.lucas.oh.us/99/Dockets-Online, click “I agree”, enter case no. “201903783” and press “search”. Do it now.

In my opinion, unions historically and favorably have been the hallmark of excellence in representing their members against mistreatment; union members have relied on unions to protect them from wrongful treatment by an employer, and members have rightfully believed when mistreatment occurs and a grievance is filed, representation from the union will occur - which would include filing and pursuing the member’s grievance through arbitration if warranted.

In my opinion, Toledo’s African-American firefighters have endured multiple patterns of discrimination from the Toledo Fire & Rescue Department, most recently by the current city administration through its fire chief, its safety director and the mayor, but to be betrayed by its public servant union exceeds any foreseeable anticipation.

I use the generic “she” in this editorial because what happened here will, if not stopped, happen to you, and, if not to you, to your children, your friends, your relatives, to the members of your community.

While training, she was accused of violating Academy policy – a policy which did not exist. In a lesson to us all, this trainee persisted; she stood her ground demanding union representation against the baseless charges. And she was right. Chief Byrd, knowing he could not win against her on the merits of the charge, even without the support of her union, let the charges lapse through passage of time. Why, because he and the administration had a new tactic.

They would let her finish the Academy, take all the tests required to be a state-certified Toledo firefighter, and then they would squash her and, along with destroying her, they would send a message to all other minorities - to keep their mouths shut, to not defend themselves against unfair and discriminatory treatment. They would wait until just before graduation and with the prize within her reach, a prize she had won through hard work and perseverance, they would fire her.

After overcoming months of harassment and discriminatory treatment at the Academy, she passed every City of Toledo and State of Ohio firefighter certification examination required for graduation. Then, after being informed she had passed, after she was given her firefighter’s badge, uniform and fire station assignment, after dressing and greeting family and friends planning on attending her graduation ceremony, just hours before that planned celebration, she was summarily terminated by Fire Chief Brian Byrd.

His justification was a non-descript, totally subjective claim of “unsatisfactory performance.” She was given no further explanation. She had never been progressively disciplined. She had never had a disciplinary hearing establishing she violated any policy, procedure, or directive which warranted a suspension or termination.

The administration had tried to railroad her, but she had stood her ground and they had failed with their trumped-up charges against her. But now under their new plan, after failing to beat her down, to stop her, they got her. Fire Chief Byrd, bowing to and joining with the same TFD ranking members whose overt discrimination she had resisted throughout the Academy, fired her without just cause. They had humiliated her publicly; they thought she would crumble and go away.

They were wrong.

She requested that Dan Desmond, president, IAFF Local 92, file a grievance protesting her termination. Incredibly, the IAFF Local 92 president asked her to tell him not just the facts of what happened to her, but he also demanded she do the union’s job, that she define the articles of the collective bargaining agreement that had been violated. If she refused or could not comply, the union would not consider going forward.

She is a union member; though not a firefighter she is a Toledo Fire & Rescue Academy Trainee. She doesn’t have a whole city administration behind her with a staff of attorneys and more funds than will ever be necessary to pursue her case. That’s why you have a union, to give you a fighting chance – some semblance of equality against a larger, more powerful employer. 

Instead, her union tried to game her, to fabricate a basis upon which to refuse to represent her in her grievance against the unfair treatment rained down upon her. Nevertheless, and to the union’s surprise and chagrin, she complied as best she could by detailing the various CBA articles that had been violated.

Remember, IAFF Local 92 solicits academy trainees, after 60 days of employment, to join the union, to begin paying dues. But for what - for non-representation? To have that union turn on its members?   This type of fee charging without representation has been addressed by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Janus v. AFSCME Council 31 June 8, 2018  the Court knocked out the agency shop/fair share fee under Illinois law. Local 92 members should read this decision and, perhaps, union members should demand refunds of dues paid for nothing. 

But again, she would not surrender, now she wasn’t just fighting for her dream, she was fighting for her family, for her ability to survive. She appealed her termination under the collective bargaining agreement rules. She asked her union to represent her in pursuing a hearing, a hearing she never had on the charges against her. She asked the union to pursue arbitration. And again, the union, per IAFF Local 92 Union President Dan Desmond, claiming support of the union board, and the union’s attorney, Donato Iorio, Esq., refused her request. They sided with the City which claimed she had no right to be heard.

Locked out of arbitration, she appealed her firing to the Toledo Civil Service Commission. Instead of giving her a hearing, the Commission met behind her back, without any notice or opportunity for her or anyone on her behalf to be heard. They ruled that she had no right to even know they were contemplating her case, they ruled she had no right to be heard.

Again, the administration, from Fire Chief Byrd to Mayor Kapszukiewicz, thought she was done. She was not. She appealed this kangaroo court decision to the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas. Her case is pending before Judge Alphonso Gonzales. And that is where it happened.

After extensive briefing, being faced with the weight of the evidence against them, the City turned to her own union - the union she has repeatedly asked for help and been turned away. Why? Because people in power don’t like being challenged and if anything has been learned through our history it is that people in power, especially, don’t like being challenged by minorities.

Not only has the union refused to help her, now in a final attempt to teach her a lesson - to teach her to stay in place, to not speak the truth, to not fight for her dreams and her family  - her union, again through Dan Desmond and Donato Iorio, have not only abandoned her, they have betrayed her - they have actively advocated against her. And by seeking to silence her, the union is now advocating against the due process rights of all IAFF Local 92 members. In this process, IAFF Local 92 has thrown the well-established position that Academy Trainees are not yet “probationary firefighters” who have no rights of notice and to be heard when they are arbitrarily disciplined and even terminated.

The union has joined the administration and now claims that an academy trainee is a probationary firefighter having no rights to appeal wrongful charges and not to be heard when the administration disciplines or terminates them. Why? Because to win, to crush and silence this female, African-American upstart, the City needs the union to overcome the sworn testimony of both the battalion chief, herself a long-term Local 92 member, who was then in charge of the Training Academy, and the sworn testimony of Fire Chief Brian Byrd, who was also a long-term member of the union until as fire chief he became a member of the City Administration.

Both have testified in another case that an academy trainee does not become a probationary firefighter who has a right to be heard on appeal of wrongful discipline or termination, until after graduation from the Academy. That testimony is now in front of Judge Alphonso Gonzales and the administration has no defense of its own against it. Now the union, Dan Desmond and Donato Iorio, after refusing her pleas to join her in her appeal, have inserted themselves without even asking the court for permission, and filed against her.

 IAFF Local 92 without any Toledo firefighter precedent to support them whatsoever now claims a trainee has no right to be heard because trainees are probationary firefighters who have no rights of due process. In doing so the union ignores the Ohio Revised Code, O.R.C. 4117.09, states clearly: “A party to [a collective bargaining] agreement may bring suit for violation of the agreement or the enforcement of an award by an arbitrator in the court of common pleas of any county wherein a party resides or transacts business.” The union goes against the very language of their own collective bargaining agreement, which states in very plain language, that probationary fire fighter term commences “after graduation.”

To support its unsupportable position, Local 92 claims it only makes sense that academy trainees can be summarily terminated without any right of notice or hearing on the validity of the claims against them as a matter of public safety. They argue that because firefighters are dealing with the lives of community citizens, Toledo administrators, including the fire chief, the safety director and the mayor must have the unbridled power to jettison probationary firefighters as part of their duty to protect the public health and safety. As applied to academy trainees however, this argument is nonsense. Academy trainees do not participate in active firefighting duties with the public, they are not allowed to even wear firefighter logoed clothing because they are not firefighters until after they graduate the Academy.

Why would the union go against its own members? Because as confirmed by Fire Chief Byrd’s recent report to Toledo City Council, only minorities - Hispanics and African Americans - have been fired from the training academy. Non-minorities have not been subjected to termination no matter if the offenses and violations charged against them were actually committed .By IAFF Local 92 taking the City of Toledo administration’s side against the rights of its members, in reality, through the 100  percent application of this policy only against minorities, the Union is taking the administration side against only the rights of African Americans and Hispanics.

While Caucasians may not care about this fight now, because it does not currently affect them, or because it doesn’t happen to them, Local 92 has abandoned the rights of all its members. It is one thing for the City of Toledo to argue for more rights, for more power over its employees, but it is unheard of, it is unprecedented and it goes against the very purpose for their existence for IAFF Local 92 Union to join the employer in denying a union member in good standing their rights to be heard, and instead to argue for the abolishment of those rights. It is the purpose of this contributing editorial to expose Local 92’s desertion, to let you know of the union’s outright rejection of members rights in the face of unconstrained and arbitrary power and to let you know how this insidious discrimination is being used right now to destroy a community member and her family.

Our community-at-large needs to know how the current City Administration and IAFF Local 92 leadership are stripping minorities - especially African Americans - of the right to be heard, the right to fair treatment, the right to a job they have earned and the ability to support their families.

Our community and employees of the Toledo Fire & Rescue Department need to stand up and firmly reject these persistent, insidious racist policies. Our community needs to do it now.

_________________________________________________________

[1] The author is the subject union member’s administrative representative.

 
 

 

   
   


Copyright © 2019 by [The Sojourner's Truth]. All rights reserved.
Revised: 03/04/20 23:05:26 -0500.


More Articles....

Toledo Community Coalition Continues Fight Against Racism

Lucas County Commissioners’ Black History Month Celebration Salutes Old Dorr Street

What the Science Says  

Mt. Nebo Baptist Church Annual Homage to “The Silent Soldiers”

Stop Telling Women to Smile: Stories of Street Harassment and How We're Taking Back Our Power by Tatyana Fazlalizadeh
 


   

Back to Home Page